<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Site-wide links can hurt your rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm</link>
	<description>Search Engine Optimization for High Ranking in Google, Yahoo, MSN</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 23:35:21 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan</title>
		<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/comment-page-1#comment-118927</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm#comment-118927</guid>
		<description>hmmm interesting post. But from my experience i must to agree, there are a penalty,  for site wide-links and for using the same keyword on 3-4 big sites for sure a site with PR4-5 go re-sandboxed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm interesting post. But from my experience i must to agree, there are a penalty,  for site wide-links and for using the same keyword on 3-4 big sites for sure a site with PR4-5 go re-sandboxed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shumail</title>
		<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/comment-page-1#comment-118599</link>
		<dc:creator>Shumail</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm#comment-118599</guid>
		<description>Well i believe it doesnt hurt but may be it gives u a very less amount of benefit..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well i believe it doesnt hurt but may be it gives u a very less amount of benefit..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: UK Webmaster Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/comment-page-1#comment-101090</link>
		<dc:creator>UK Webmaster Forum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 05:33:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm#comment-101090</guid>
		<description>Sitewide links can&#039;t HURT, rather they may not help much in some instances. I don&#039;t place a lot of value on them to contribute to the increased chance of ranking improvements in the search engines. 
A sitewide link will generally only produce the same results if there were on a couple of links and if there are on many different sites, all with the same or similar anchor text, then there might be filter that might get tripped.
So getting a minimal of it is the key, thanks for the post!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sitewide links can&#8217;t HURT, rather they may not help much in some instances. I don&#8217;t place a lot of value on them to contribute to the increased chance of ranking improvements in the search engines.<br />
A sitewide link will generally only produce the same results if there were on a couple of links and if there are on many different sites, all with the same or similar anchor text, then there might be filter that might get tripped.<br />
So getting a minimal of it is the key, thanks for the post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/comment-page-1#comment-98468</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 21:27:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm#comment-98468</guid>
		<description>Obviously his site is not ranked for the keyword &quot;wordpress themes&quot;, because he doesn&#039;t use that keyword. Please check his site and the keywords he uses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously his site is not ranked for the keyword &#8220;wordpress themes&#8221;, because he doesn&#8217;t use that keyword. Please check his site and the keywords he uses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Google Success</title>
		<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/comment-page-1#comment-97361</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Success</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 04:40:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm#comment-97361</guid>
		<description>Hi Andrew, the sitewide backlinks for briangardners can improve his pagerank but still he is not ranking for his keyword in the title &#039;wordpress themes&#039;. It is easy to rank for a keyword in the domain which is unique like &#039;brian gardner&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Andrew, the sitewide backlinks for briangardners can improve his pagerank but still he is not ranking for his keyword in the title &#8216;wordpress themes&#8217;. It is easy to rank for a keyword in the domain which is unique like &#8216;brian gardner&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm/comment-page-1#comment-97348</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 02:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.google-success.com/site-wide-links-can-hurt-your-rankings.htm#comment-97348</guid>
		<description>A rubbish theory. Google has not announced anywhere that they discard the site wide links. A good example is this guys site &quot;http://www.briangardner.com/&quot; 99% of the links are site wide links. Backlinks from his wordpress designs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A rubbish theory. Google has not announced anywhere that they discard the site wide links. A good example is this guys site &#8220;http://www.briangardner.com/&#8221; 99% of the links are site wide links. Backlinks from his wordpress designs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
