Comments on: Cuil, an answer to Google? http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm Search Engine Optimization for High Ranking in Google, Yahoo, MSN Wed, 09 Mar 2011 06:41:57 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: shweta http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm/comment-page-1#comment-45240 shweta Sat, 20 Dec 2008 10:46:19 +0000 http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm#comment-45240 well....cuil still has long way to go... google is unbeatable and morover very user friendly. google is the best one well….cuil still has long way to go…

google is unbeatable and morover very user friendly.

google is the best one

]]> By: Arama Motoru http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm/comment-page-1#comment-40379 Arama Motoru Mon, 10 Nov 2008 03:55:08 +0000 http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm#comment-40379 Cuil is not good as Google Search Engine.Cuil is new and I think it is too difficult to reach to the level of Google. Cuil is not good as Google Search Engine.Cuil is new and I think it is too difficult to reach to the level of Google.

]]> By: SEO Tips http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm/comment-page-1#comment-34945 SEO Tips Mon, 08 Sep 2008 00:37:07 +0000 http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm#comment-34945 Way over hyped is right, the results page is ugly imo 2 and 3 columns doesn't work for searching, nor does the random off the wall image that appears too. Not to mention the results are crap. Way over hyped is right, the results page is ugly imo 2 and 3 columns doesn’t work for searching, nor does the random off the wall image that appears too.

Not to mention the results are crap.

]]> By: Tim Stark http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm/comment-page-1#comment-34806 Tim Stark Sat, 06 Sep 2008 11:41:46 +0000 http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm#comment-34806 CUIL has been way over-hyped to no end on TV and on the web. I've tried it several times and each time, I have been extremely disappointed with it's results. That's great that they display the search results in a magazine format but when you don't have any search results to display, how useful is that? CUIL has been way over-hyped to no end on TV and on the web. I’ve tried it several times and each time, I have been extremely disappointed with it’s results.

That’s great that they display the search results in a magazine format but when you don’t have any search results to display, how useful is that?

]]> By: Altuma Webdesign http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm/comment-page-1#comment-34529 Altuma Webdesign Thu, 04 Sep 2008 14:46:23 +0000 http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm#comment-34529 I think cuil's search is pretty inferior. Searching my own company's name 'altuma' doesn't bring it's official site even on the first page. First 1-2 links are some web directories and some other irellevant spam and the rest of the results are for what they think is a mispelling: Altima. That's some car. Well I'm interested in what I typed not in altima. It's algorithms are pretty lame. Bad investment imho. If a google hater (me) didn't like cuil then who would? I think cuil’s search is pretty inferior. Searching my own company’s name ‘altuma’ doesn’t bring it’s official site even on the first page. First 1-2 links are some web directories and some other irellevant spam and the rest of the results are for what they think is a mispelling: Altima. That’s some car. Well I’m interested in what I typed not in altima. It’s algorithms are pretty lame. Bad investment imho. If a google hater (me) didn’t like cuil then who would?

]]> By: Ruben Zevallos Jr. http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm/comment-page-1#comment-32431 Ruben Zevallos Jr. Sun, 17 Aug 2008 03:10:56 +0000 http://www.google-success.com/cuil-an-answer-to-google.htm#comment-32431 I think the first think they did... a very good crawler and good money... but the results still have lot of more work... I think the first think they did… a very good crawler and good money… but the results still have lot of more work…

]]>