Menlo Park based Cuil (pronounced ‘cool’), has launched a massive search engine today, with an index of 120 billion web pages. This is arguably the most comprehensive search engine on the web. Patterson believes that’s at least three times the size of Google’s index, although there is no way to know for certain as Google doesn’t disclose the size of their index.
This massive search engine project was founded by highly respected search experts, husband-and-wife team of Stanford professor Tom Costello and former Google search architect Anna Patterson, joined by Russell Power who also is an ex-Google empoyee.
Anna Patterson’s last Internet search engine was so impressive that search engine leader Google Inc. bought the technology in 2004 to upgrade its own search engine. She believes her latest invention is even more valuable, however, this time it won’t be for sale.
The most striking difference between Cuil and Google is in its ranking system. Rather than assigning authority and higher rankings to pages based on inbound links as Google does (“Pagerank“), Cuil analyzes the content of Web pages to decide their relevance to a search query.
Cuil claims its search is contextual. What this means, in the real world, is that Cuil results are automatically categorized. So, if you search for ‘Japan’, Cuil will automatically bring up relevant categories such as ‘Prefectures of Japan’, ‘Port Cities in Japan’ etc.

Cuil’s results are presented in a more magazine-like format instead of just a vertical stack of Web links. Cuil’s results are displayed with more photos spread horizontally across the page and include sidebars for categories to the right of results, that can be clicked on to learn more about topics related to the original search request.
Backed by $33 million in venture capital, the search engine plans to begin processing requests for the first time starting from today. Cuil is just the latest in a long line of Google challengers. Compared with Google’s globe spanning data network of data centers, Cuil’s two modest data centers hosting less than 2,000 PCs total will have to run pretty fast to outpace Google’s crawlers. On the very first day of their launch, their servers seem to be out of power to handle the unexpected surge in traffic on their website.Â
I was further disappointed with its search results when I tried to search for ‘indian curry’. I received the response – “We didn’t find any results for indian curry … please check your spelling …â€. That’s a big flaw in Cuil’s algorithm. Cuil also failed to fetch any results for other long tail keywords I tried, like ‘tokyo based chinese restaurants’. And. when I tried searching for ’seo consultants in mumbai’, it fetched all the consultants in USA and Germany !! I feel there is long way to go for Cuil to take on Google.

Technorati Tags: Cuil, search engine, Pagerank, Google
9 Responses
Top SEO Promotions
July 30th, 2008 at 3:25 pm
1Thanks for the honest review. I agree that Cuil is ambitious but has many serious flaws. For many queries, it shows hundreds of thousands of matching search results, but you can not go beyond the first page! I did not expect that from a search engine which created so much anticipation.
LisaFav
August 12th, 2008 at 12:46 pm
2Hi there,
I have tried CUIL too and has blogged about it at http://www.milliondollar-pages.blogspot.com.
I tried to find my blog from CUIL, and resulting nothing, but Google is able to find some of my blog pages online.
website design
August 13th, 2008 at 5:17 pm
3I emailed them using their site but until now i havent heard from them. Also tried searching my site on CUIL but its not there yet.
Ruben Zevallos Jr.
August 17th, 2008 at 12:10 pm
4I think the first think they did… a very good crawler and good money… but the results still have lot of more work…
Altuma Webdesign
September 4th, 2008 at 11:46 pm
5I think cuil’s search is pretty inferior. Searching my own company’s name ‘altuma’ doesn’t bring it’s official site even on the first page. First 1-2 links are some web directories and some other irellevant spam and the rest of the results are for what they think is a mispelling: Altima. That’s some car. Well I’m interested in what I typed not in altima. It’s algorithms are pretty lame. Bad investment imho. If a google hater (me) didn’t like cuil then who would?
Tim Stark
September 6th, 2008 at 8:41 pm
6CUIL has been way over-hyped to no end on TV and on the web. I’ve tried it several times and each time, I have been extremely disappointed with it’s results.
That’s great that they display the search results in a magazine format but when you don’t have any search results to display, how useful is that?
SEO Tips
September 8th, 2008 at 9:37 am
7Way over hyped is right, the results page is ugly imo 2 and 3 columns doesn’t work for searching, nor does the random off the wall image that appears too.
Not to mention the results are crap.
Arama Motoru
November 10th, 2008 at 12:55 pm
8Cuil is not good as Google Search Engine.Cuil is new and I think it is too difficult to reach to the level of Google.
shweta
December 20th, 2008 at 7:46 pm
9well….cuil still has long way to go…
google is unbeatable and morover very user friendly.
google is the best one
RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI
Leave a reply
SEO & Web Design
Categories
Archives
Links
Meta
Calendar
© 2005-2008 Google Success | SEO SEM Directory | Theme design by BloggingPro and Design Disease